Don Facade: "You have said repeatedly that, instead of being allowed to marry, they should be compelled to seek counseling."

Again you're lying intentionally, to mislead others into a hostility,..to hide the FACT that you, argued for two threads, quite a few posts, that homosexuals could not opt out. That is a blatant lie..being as later you admitted to knowing of two. Sounds like you have a 'hidden agenda'...hmm...wonder what that can be....


P. S. Now, GfS, I can understand that since your father sired a batch of kids, including you, then "decided" he was gay and left your mother and you kids to go off with a male lover, ..blah blah blah, more lies!

My Father died at 60, due to a stroke. He was married once, to my mother, who is still alive, and she never re-married.
You just make shit up..as you have all through these threads. You've twisted quotes, and responded to the twists that you make up....now just what is it, that you are trying to hide???

In an Francisco, a city government employee can get a trans gender operation, at taxpayer expense, which happens to come with a considerable amount of counseling..and BTW, without that counseling, you cannot get that operation.....HOWEVER, you seem to object, for a homosexual receiving counseling, to be straight, IF they want to...sorta' funny reckoning of equality, wouldn't you say??..just what is it that you're hiding?????

Both Smedley and Royston, had the balls to make a correction, when they discovered that they made a mistake..but you can't, even when your own posts are contradicted by, none other, than you!..Now just what is it, you're trying to hide??...maybe even hide from yourself?
By the way, I respected both of them for that...even in light of the stirring up of hostilities, that you've managed to try to whoop up.

What is it that you're trying to keep people distracted from??

Let me see, you are all for homosexuals raising children, by adoption, but get greatly distressed when natural heterosexuals, point out some of the joys of having and raising their own children, and wanting to protect them from bullshit political left wing crap...Am I seeing a pattern here??

Oh..oh yes, then you wish to insult me, by taking your best shot(?), by making up that my Father was a homosexual who left my mother...PURE BULLSHIT!

I think what is closer to the truth, is the reason you think that should 'get my goat'(which it doesn't, because is so left field), is that you're the one who has issues with homosexuals! To you, your 'insult' was a wild shot, at likening my Dad, to something YOU find less or it wouldn't be an 'insult', would it????

It appears that you 'approve' of homosexuals raising kids, but don't approve of homosexuals, leaving homosexuality, to have heterosexual relationships, and children of their own.

It is now becoming pretty obvious why.
Given your past, of having a child, and NOT staying around to raise him, for whatever bullshit reason you rationalize away, you don't want a homosexual to be able to do that...because that would make him, a better man than you!...and after all, YOU'RE the one who looks down on homosexuals...or why would you have thrown such a stupid accusation at me, using homosexuality as the object of lowness?? You, yourself said, in an earlier post, that 'civil rights' were aimed at helping the 'weakest' people. I think you're tipping your view, just to launder the FACT, that, as a 'father' you were nothing more than a self absorbed, ego gratifying, womanizing ball less opportunist. I mean, to say...that's exactly how you described yourself, and how you conduct yourself on here....not to mention, that you've lied through your teeth....REPEATEDLY....and play the piper, to those who you consider 'weak'(your words).

If I were one of the homosexuals on here, I'd hop aboard the 'clue train' and see you for what you are. Not only that, I'd be pissed, that your try to DENY them counseling, for whatever reason they'd wish to seek it!

I guess it's how you get your sense of self importance..I mean to say, if a person goes to a church, as you've said, and doesn't even believe it, then the only reason you're going is to placate your wife, and being as your track record is that of a ball-less meep, who can't stand up to, or assume a responsibility to a woman that you've impregnated...God only knows what other sorts of insecurities you have!...Oh, 'Mister 'Civil Rights' agitator!

Most Sincerely,
GfS

P.S. Don't even respond!..You've got a lot of self reflecting to do, before you start a new thread of lying to your audience!...to gain a sense of power.....Ball-less meeps do that! Save what dignity you fantasize that you have.