I really do not want "a further discussion." I only wanted to establish that there is no sign of AIDS breaking into the general population.
First you thought it was, then yesterday you changed your mind and then changed it back again.
De Cock. "Reported as saying" in capitals.
Is that you suggesting he did not say those things? Say what you mean.
I laughed last night at your about turns and posturing, but never about the value of education, which I am part of.
I have told you I don't agree with stigmatising.
You talk about me knowing what I say is wrong and being a liar.
I have said nothing that is wrong and do not lie.
That casual false indictment makes me bloody angry.
You never give examples, because you can not.

The BMJ piece just said what I have been saying. What is not to like?

The Edinburgh research. Strains have evolved slightly differently in different places.
The strain we in the West have mostly experienced. Heteros have been exposed and a few have caught it, but no epidemic.
The African one has now arrived with our new communities, and local heteros will be exposed to it, but it is less virulent than the one that has already failed.

I am taking a week off.
Good luck with it.