A note about reading the peice that has been posted here. I notice that many readers take generalized statements as referring to all parties, therefore, in an artical about Loyalist crime, when the sentence about paramilitartaries involved in drugs and prostitution is quoted, some will read into that the missreading that both sides were involved in that. Nowing reporting on the North the way we do, don't you think if a bad action related to the IRA and the INLA as well as the loyalists, the reporter would spell that out, in fact, would highlight the fact the IRA and INLA were up to that? Well, for what it is worth.
Best wishes to all and I hope you are having a better summer than I,
Larry