Hold on Lizzie,

You have stated that a woman who brings a man home or goes to his room or whatever when she doesn't kow him very well, is foolish and taking a risk that kind of renders her deserving of everything she gets.

Then when folkie dave says:

"If a bloke has travelled a long way to meet someone he has met on the web he might be expecting more than a cup of tea. Would she have led him on do we think?"

you say:

"Depends on the bloke. Depends on the woman. Depends on the cup of tea, I'd imagine. She may love 'builder's tea' in a grubby tin mug. He may love 'Earl Grey' in a flower covered china cup and saucer.

People have to have the right 'blend' don't they, Dave?

If they do, then I'd imagine their teapot would runneth over.

And if they don't, then I'd think their tealeaves could become terribly strained."

Why the double standards?

You have until now been unequivocal in your bombast.

Now suddenly you are extremely cagey and ambiguous.

Should I deduce something from this?