Keith, is this more evidence of an opinion that you might hold?

"I think that Akeneaton does regard heterosexuality as a disease.
Before denouncing him, remember that that was the mainstream public and medical belief within our lifetimes. The change is not due to any scientific breakthrough, just a change in perceptions.

We can disagree, but it is a valid point of view."

Because when you argue against "liberals" you tell them that settled scientific conclusion and evidence is the only thing to be considered. So the only view that can be tolerated is that homosexuality is not a disease, isn't it? That is the settled scientific position.

Or are we to understand that you assert ignorant ranting bigots are deserving of some special protection, indulgence or consideration?