1) Building 7 was a separate issue..it caught fire and burned for hours under different conditions.

2)WHO says molten steel was found, and what did 'they' say was the source of it? If steel from the upper floors were in fact melted, it seems to me it would be on top the debris, not under it.

Remember, it is not required for me to 'prove' that the official explanations are wrong...it is for those who insinuate otherwise and claim a conspiracy to provide reasonable reasons! (reasons which must explain HOW beyond just assertions of 'planted explosives'.... you just cannot assert 'it couldn't have happened the way you say' without better evidence than amateur conjecture.)