"...NIST falsified the structure of the core."

Now THAT is a new point...is that your analysis/opinion/conclusion? Or is it from some expert?
If it is true, it is important and should be/have been cited and investigated by someone who knows what to do with such serious 'data'.
If it is just your personal interpretation of the blueprints + your view of how the information is relevant, I can't see why I should be alarmed, as *I* am not competent to evaluate those areas of physics and construction.

**serious accusations require serious evidence**

(clothes changed and heading out the door.)