Keith,

That you keep repeating the same old dross at thin air, does not mean that anyone is trying to "slink away". This is exactly the behaviour I predicted from you, accurately.

I have no problem with my "grotesque sexual behaviour / morals" comment. I have explained it twice now - why do you keep shouting into thin air that I have not explained it?

Ake/GfS were asserting that gay men were suffering HIV because of those things. I explained, given the other STI figures, that on that basis, straight people must be suffering other STI's for exactly the same reasons. My position is that the argument is bogus when directed any person or group. So don't be so fatuous, you are not in school now, teacher. When people cast an inaccurate assertion at one group, the simples way to deal with it is to show how it could equally apply to another - and be inapplicable therefore to either.

Yes, Keith, I accuse you of being a bigot. I have explained why. I have provided as a direct copy/paste the principal comment that leads me to that view. You deny it. Fine, people will have to make their minds up. But don't say that anything has not been explained, it has been.

Why are you banging on about the damn quote marks. You asked for a correction to that, which I happily gave.

And now you show your true colours: "Anti straight agenda". Is Lox "anti-straight", or Don T or Don F or any of the others that argued against homophobia? Am I "anti-white" for arguing against racism? Am I anti-atheist (or a Catholic) for arguing here against religious intolerance? Am I anti-Christian for arguing against islamophobia? How far are you going to tie yourself in knots with that line of your bigoted attack.

No, my views are clear and consistent.

So are yours...now! This is good stuff, Keith. Keep it coming.