"Bill, just read my posts. I've already posted the evidence..."

I gather that means that it is your conclusion that the NIST 'falsified' data and that therefore the govt. is lying about something.
Since I have said that *I* do not feel competent to make that determination, and that I see FAR too many problems with the very process of basing a conspiracy theory on data that experts should already have seen, if it were relevant, I must now agree with catspaw and decline to continue this. If YOU feel it is that clear & obvious, I suggest you badger some 'authority', or write your congressman, rather than expecting me to keep answering questions I cannot answer.

MY concerns (as should be obvious) continue to be about the very nature and process OF conspiracy theories.

I may read any future posts, but I will not debate or respond unless I see something really new.