"the complete collapse was prevented"

No collapse ever began. There was no partial collapse or any kind of collapse at all, just an impending collapse that never happened at all, none what so ever because it was prevented.

What Amos needs to do is say that there was no collapse. The collapse was prevented like Obama said, instead of implying with carefull wording that the collapse was in progress but then reversed by Obama.

This is known as spin. I didn't see Obama put any spin on it.

Of course if a Republican does not state the absolute, literal binary truth, it is called a "Big Lie". Even when they do state the truth thay are called lies because of the double standard employed by Libs to prove their "abstract formulations" which they claim to be the truth.

By the way Amos, Has anyone ever been able to stop an avalanche?

I am not going to call you stupid Amos. I feel that such name calling has no place in a legitimate forum.

Bobert: Why is it so tedious to show who spent what? You would rather have the record say that GWB "gave" the money to the banks rather than loaned it to them. You would rather have it added to the Bush deficit and subtracted from the Obama deficit rather than the other way around.