You couldn't possibly be more laughably wrong, robomatic. Whereas the study of creationism requires the suspension of the use of scientific method, what I am suggesting is that we apply the scientific method to the investigation of what happened on 9/11 (for the first time). I'm sure that if your cherished beliefs about what happened on 9/11 are valid, they will withstand the rigors of the scientific process. But perhaps that's what you're worried about. Maybe you're concerned that they won't, and that's why you don't agree that we need a thorough scientific investigation into what happened on 9/11 and a rigorous peer review of the results.