Royston, that term, "conspiracy theorist" really has no place in a logical discussion about the events of 9/11, because the way it is being used is a logical fallacy. It is used to try to silence people who are asking legitimate questions through the use of an ad hominem argument. And it ignores the fact that the government's theory is also a conspiracy theory, so it is illogical also because it is inconsistent.

So I would ask you a similar question - why would you try to rationalize with people who are approaching the discussion of the events of 9/11 in such an illogical and inconsistent manner, and who are so opposed to approaching the question of what happened on 9/11 in a manner that is scientific and logical?