Here we have an example of two people, Royston and Bill D, who are themselves guilty using logical fallacies as the basis for their arguments, and whose entire argument in favor of accepting the government's version of events with no evidence to back it up, is that they believe in that version of events, so it must be true. And these two people, who are operating entirely on belief and faith and not on science and logic, are accusing others of being irrational.