Royston, it is not necessary to show how things did happened in order to successfully refute the government's version of events. That is a straw man. The only thing that is necessary is to prove that it was not possible for them to happen the way the government is saying they did. That's all. We already have enough evidence that the government's version of events is not credible. That alone is reason enough to have a thorough investigation into what happened on 9/11.

And there are many good reasons to do this. We need to know the truth, whatever it is. Even if it makes people like you and Bill uncomfortable.