The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #128011   Message #2862020
Posted By: VirginiaTam
11-Mar-10 - 03:07 PM
Thread Name: BS: Onshore windfarms
Subject: RE: BS: Onshore windfarms
SoP provided the link to the document from which the nimby reference hails.    "I make no apology for being termed a NIMBY....." Please don't flap when another poster employs a term that technically you introduced to the thread?

Now to get back on track... birds killed by turbines google turned up some interesting things.

Eagles 'killed by wind turbines

and this

Birds Not Being Killed by Wind Farms -Ecologist

Thu Nov 25,11:19 AM ET

LONDON (Reuters) - Two major offshore wind farms in Denmark are giving the lie to fears that birds are being killed by flying into the huge vanes of such installations, a conference heard on Thursday.

In fact, not only were birds not dying, the Danish farms had actually benefitted the local environment, ecologist Charlotte Boesen of Denmark's Energi E2 energy trading and generation firm told the conference on wind energy.

Birds were simply flying over or around the huge packs of turbines, and the seabed foundations had created an artificial reef that was attracting new species to colonize and providing a haven for fish as trawling there was banned.

"So far the observed effects have been positive," she said.

and this Audubon Society supports wind energy

Farmland birds still chirpy despite wind turbines

and from how stuff works.com

Man-made structure/technology Associated bird deaths per year (U.S.)

Feral and domestic cats Hundreds of millions [source: AWEA]

Power lines 130 million -- 174 million [source: AWEA]

Windows (residential and commercial) 100 million -- 1 billion [source: TreeHugger]

Pesticides 70 million [source: AWEA]

Automobiles 60 million -- 80 million [source: AWEA]

Lighted communication towers 40 million -- 50 million [source: AWEA]

Wind turbines 10,000 -- 40,000 [source: ABC]