You're still speculating though, LadyJean, and that's not proof. The only way we can get something even resembling proof is to conduct a forensic investigation. Right now, not only do we not have any proof, we don't even have any evidence that things happened the way the official story claims they happened. And we don't even have a full explanation of what happened in the official story from the government. For instance, in order for the buildings to have fallen from fire or airplanes crashing into them, it would need to be possible for this to happen. The government hasn't got any explanations of how the twin towers could have fallen, or even any evidence that was possible for fire or airplane crashes to cause them to fall, whereas we have a lot of evidence that this would not be possible.

People use the way Bush behaved as evidence that he was aware of what was going to happen ahead of time as well. Nobody would accept that as evidence of a government conspiracy, and they would be right not to. We shouldn't accept it as evidence that the governments story is correct, either.