You're saying that it's GOOD to retard children to the point where they're made dependent? That's a collectivist outlook--you have to cripple children so that there will be jobs created (social services) to take care of them. That's good for the wage earners, but what about the kids?

You present a good case that being dropped on the head can be just as damaging as a bad education to a child, but surely the part of your brain that was left unmashed must be capable of SOME reasoning.