Just because you or we agree with a position does not mean that it should be the exclusive position projected by "the folk" however that is what seems to have happened.

Unless someone comes forward with the encorporation of opposing viewpoints in these programmes or concerts.

No matter what political persuasion and they are all persuasions rather than utopias- all political persuasions philosophies have flaws none are perfect not even ours- those who adopt them believe them to be right.

Just like you believe that your views and the philosophies you support are correct and right. That does not mean that the world is not filled with other philosophies that may also be viaable.

So if we get them all in the same room I dont think anyone will attack anyone else but at least each side gets heard out. If you never meet then you can never share or convince anyone.

The philosophies I support all need help in practice and perhaps in basic constructs.

To fill the media with one side is media abuse. Seger and all flew the banner of inclusion while excluding the political views of other philosophies and groups. That is unless someone comes forward to demonstrate how they were more open- in which case they were manipulative.

Conrad