he is a tea bagger first and a doctor second. That would more precisely explain his rude attitude and his lack of concern for the constitutional provision of the secret ballot.
"Rude attitude", right. But there was nothing that I read in the article or earlier in this thread that suggests he had a "lack of concern for the constitutional provision of the secret ballot."
Though I would be one who he suggests should pass him by, I would point out that he merely puts his attitude out there in public and lets the established or potential patient make the judgment. He doesn't appear to require an affidavit of non-Obama voting.