""I know that the wikileaks article tried to give every impression that they DID KNOW they were firing on children, but then that was the whole purpose behind the article, to paint as black a picture as possible.""

They certainly knew they were firing on an unarmed man, too badly wounded to crawl into cover, who was being carried by two more unarmed men.

They knew that they had blown all the "armed" men to hell, including the one who was armed with a camera.

And they knew that any weapons were down on the deck, and many yards out of reach of both the journalist, and the men from the van.

There was nobody alive in sight, who constituted any threat to anyone this side of the grave, and they knew that too!

Nobody, in or out of the van, had a weapon pointed at them, five k distant, and nobody moved one pace towards the weapons which were in sight.

How could the article make them look any blacker than in fact they were, in their eagerness for another kill?

Don T.