BillD,

"Wattenberg is either a good source, or he is not....no matter what anyone thinks about Gore & others."

First part true- but MY POINT was that you did NOT use that standard in insisting Gore WAS a good source. You make Wattenberg meet standards that you argued against when they were applied to Gore.




"(It makes me wonder whether, in a conservative forum with only a few liberals, you would carefully make note of perceived conservative double-standards for fairness sake.) "

Of course I would- and when there are enough conservatives here for their viewpoint to be accepted without proof, I'll be pointing out their flaws- UNLIKE what you have done in only demanding that those you oppose have to demonstrate their claims, and those you agree with get to ride without question.