"The answer is no- YET THE FACTS THEY PUT FORWARD were not allowed, because they made money ( Like Saint AL.).

SO GORE SHOULD BE TREATED THE SAME WAY"
In my readings the facts that the "evil energy companies" ,as you put it, have put out have largely been based not on scientific study of climate change, but by a desire to sow the seeds of doubt and confusion in the debate. This is separate from legitamate GW doubters whose opposing views should be respectfully examined and some few times have not been. The "EEC" claims strike me as being very similar to the Tobacco Institute claims that tobacco products don't cause cancer.
I still don't see where YOU have revealed that Al Gore did anything wrong or unethical, or that his divorce will be a watershed in revealing those unworthy deeds. Is his fault that you disagree with him?
I may comment further once I'm through with band practice