What I think is interesting is that certain media seem to be like thieves:   i.e." no honor among".

Big front-page article in the Wall St Journal 8 June 2010 on exactly the topic:   Obsession and big cats.

Why does it seem likely that Reuters people--and others, no doubt--read the WSJ article.


Any acknowledgement in the 9 June 2010 Reuters article of the WSJ inspiration?   Not likely.   And it's not the first time.   Washington Post does the same thing.

Maybe it's hard to admit a Murdoch -owned property can do anything worthwhile.