What a lot of not-very-well-informed mouthfoaming is mixed in this thread alongside the well-informed stuff!

Are we to assume that the first catagory is all in the thread which you don't agree with (meaning anything critical of PRS) and the second catagory is that which you do agree with (meaning anything which is not critical of PRS)?

And despite your best efforts at a white-wash on behalf of PRS that you refer to in 2003-2005, I do not remember you putting these issues to bed for anyone, except perhaps yourself.   

Unless you are prepared to be specific on what you judge to be not-very-well-informed mouthfoaming and provide the reasons why you are making this judgement - it is not possible for anyone to provide an answer or for us to have a sensible discussion. Perhaps contributing to a sensible discussion was not the intention of your post?