Bruce,

You're missing a big point here.


Paint pellets, upon impact with a hard surface, will splatter in all directions.

Paint pellets containing glass, upon impact with a hard surface, will splatter in all directions.


In both cases you will see the point of impact with splatter radiating out from its centre in a circle.


So your alleged point above, in which you purport to have discovered a flaw in Carols argument is a waste of your time.



We know that if it is blood, it isn't from an Israeli trooper, as they weren't on the ship yet.

And it appears very likely that it isn't paint from a paint ball as there is far too much and it hasn't splatted, but has sprayed.


The idea that the night-vision video was faked is new to me, but before this idea being floated, it was already pretty clear to me that the IDF fired before they landed.


It seems that the IDF faked two other videos, one being the video of the boat being sprayed with water, and the other of the man walking through the metal post.

It is also pretty clear to me that the 'weapons cache' photos were fake, and that the Mavi Marmara "9/11" radio communication was faked.


It wouldn't be incongruous if the night-vision film had been faked.

Of course that doesn't prove anything on its own.

But an interesting point to consider is, that if it is genuine, it would be the only apparent bit of IDF provided evidence not to be discredited.

I'm curious to know more about allegations that it was filmed on the Mavi Marmaras sister ship.