"Saville believed it after balancing the evidence available to the extent that he made a specific comment on it."
Then why are you bringing in irrelevant speculation as to whether the "
"OIRA were trying to provoke an incident that the PIRA would be blamed for?" which was not considered in the report (other than to divert the thread from the fact that the British Army shot down thirteen unarmed (British) demonstrators.
Those responsible for the massacre have lied and covered up for well over thirt years - isn't it rather too late to try and get them off the hook by shifting the blame after they've actually got round to 'fessing up"?
Jim Carroll