That was an aside by the way, and not really pertinent to the overall question. I kept my (typing) mouth shut over the 'blood v's paint' debate as I had no way of knowing what the case was. However if a government body is to be trusted with an investigation it's best that they don't fake evidence. The fact that everyone knows they faked evidence, means they can't be trusted to undertake an impartial internal investigation. Any conclusions they come to will be tainted by the fact that the whole world KNOWS that they are bare-faced liars!