""There are deaths, so Israel must have committed an atrocity.
They had wounds to their backs, so must have been running away.""

Let's see if your logic is up to the task of handling a simple concept.

Hypothetically:- I have a hand gun. There are a number of people who are threatening to hit me on the head (well actually, the bullet resistant helmet) with iron bars.

I have choices.

1. I fire in the air, which in most cases would clear my opponents without bloodshed.

2. I fire at the nearest and most dangerous opponent, killing or injuring him, and the rest head for the hills.


What I do NOT do, is to continue shooting those fleeing opponents up to four times in the back.

1. It simply isn't necessary.
2. It simply IS murder.

Now, perhaps you with your vastly superior knowledge can explain to me in what other circumstances, most of the dead could have bullet entry holes in their backs?

And please don't suggest that anybody can mount a serious attack with his back to the intented victim.

Don T