It did get out of Gaza, the rockets continued.

Malnutrition is a bad thing found in many countries including developed ones.
No one is starving in Gaza. Why exagerate when the truth is bad enough.
It weakens your case.

Whatever plans you are talking about, there is no ethnic cleansing going on.
The issues over land are bad enough. Exagerating and using emotive expressions that do not describe the actual situation weakens your case.

You may have a hard time not seeing "incipient genocide" whatever that is, but genocide has a clear definition and is not happening in Gaza. What is happening is bad enough. Why exagerate wildly?

Israel did not use WP in confined spaces. It was delivered by artillery and aircraft to create smoke.
The use close to civillians was reckless and deplorable, but it was not a chemical weapons attack.
Why exagerate when the truth is bad enough?