Thanks, Bill. Actually, I asked you those questions as a kind of a poke in the ribs, in response to your statement that you can't accept that any part of your corporeal body has an empowered non-corporeal function (paraphrased) . I meant to be pointing out that we all daily utilize the non-corporeal.

(Incidentally, why do we say corporeal body? Is there another kind that belongs to us? :)

The reason I am impressed by David Eagleman's approach is that it points to my belief that we should all incorporate intangibles - the non-physical - into any equation. But as Red Green demonstrates, there are three words that are very difficult for any man to utter:















"I don't know" *g*