Doug,your opinion (as usual) is a very logical one. I alluded to Rush Limbaugh's use of the femi-nazi term saying that it's a common method of propaganda to use a term against your enemies that is likely to be used against you. It's also a common tactic in debate and advertising. Those on the Right are generally the most vulnerable to the Fascist or Nazi appellation,as those on the left are often labeled Communist or Socialist.Therefore it is very crafty of Limbaugh to hijack the nazi term.I don't think Rush is a Nazi,nor do I think he's a Fascist. I would put him just a hair to the left of Reactionary.He makes a lot of common-sense statements interspersed with some very flakey observations (Tourette's Syndrome is a politically correct disease),enjoys noting an obvious political trend,predicting its outcome,and then patting himself on the back for it,and has a remarkable propensity for personal vendetta against those he despises politically,while remaining blind to any error by those he supports.Other than that,he's great.Why are there no Liberal counterparts to Limbaugh?Mainly because we Democrats can rarely agree long enough or on a wide enough collection of issues to say "ditto."We are a motley crew indeed.In fact,you Republicans should be ashamed if you let a disreputable bunch like us back in the WhiteHouse for another four years.I always thought the best thing the Democratic Party could do would be to get some Republicans to run it.Ever been to a Democratic Convention?Sorry,of course you haven't. But sheesh,what a disorganized mess.Who was it said "I am currently not a member of any organized political party - I'm a Democrat"...he had it right.