Let's not forget that this story has emerged only in the last few days, and only as the result of an anonymous leak. I have no doubt that EFDSS intends to issue a statement at the appropriate time. However there are procedures to be followed in these circumstances, and confidentiality is important for the sake of both parties. I will be very surprised if the official statement, when it comes, adds anything to what is already being circulated.

It is important for any organisation that new appointments not only have the necessary technical skills but also that their "face fits". It is common practice for positions to be offered on a probationary basis.

I suspect that for reasons of confidentiality the EFDSS will be constrained from giving the full details behind the decision, even at an AGM. The Board is entrusted with the day to day running of the Society, and the question is, therefore, what can EFDSS members do when the Board makes a decision they disagree with?