You have claimed there were large numbers of children involved in the rioting -
"Jim, every account describes LARGE numbers of very young children, outside agitators and disgusted locals."
WHERE ARE THESE REPORTS
There is no indication whatever that there were any significant number of kids on the riots, as you have been claiming throughout.
It is of concern to us all that ANY children should be involved, but to claim that they were there in large numbers in order to give the impression, as you earlier claimed, that the trouble on the marches were only 'skirmishes' by bored childern recruited for the purpose is despicable.
It is using children the way you claimed the dissidents did, in order to make a political point - real slimeball stuff.
"I feel I have produced ample evidence, and you NONE."
And now you appear to be trying to bluster your way out of it
WHERE ARE THESE REPORTS OF LARGE NUMBERS OF VERY YOUNG CHILDREN BEING INVOLVED AS YOU CLAIMED???
It is really no surprise to me or anybody, I should guess, that you "are done with this bit" - you appear to have shot your load good and proper
Jim Carroll