"
Jim, the reports tell us that large numbers of childen were in the riots."
Where exactly?
This now becomes absurd; there is NO MENTIION OF LARGE NUMBERS OF CHILDREN RIOTING IN ANY OF THE REPORTS I HAVE READ NOR ANY YOU HAVE PUT UP - FACT
"State that you do not believe that large numbers of children were rioting"
I do not believe that there is any evidence whatsoever of large numbers of children (let alone young people rioting) if this is not the case, produce it.
"The number of young children involved was large enough for it to constitute a "serious problem" to the police."
One child rioting is cause for concern and would merit attention by the police.
Matt Baggott is quoted as saying; "
Members are also concerned that children as young as eight were involved in the rioting in Ardoyne and are fully supportive of measures the PSNI, alongside Social Services, plan to put in place to tackle this serious problem."
No numbers, no percentages, not even large numbers - just young people.
As I said before, you are lying in order to shift the blame for the riots on to children - sewer level I'd say.
"Certainly qualifies as a report of activities as observed as far as I am concerned Keith. "
The Parrot seems to have acquired a parrot of his own.
Jim Carroll