I actually think evolution is one paradigm that may survive longer than most. One never can say never in science, and evolution will get more answers, but I doubt actual revisions. If something would come along that made a better explanation I still think it will be called evolution.

It can be attacked a great many ways but, so far, it always has an answer.

THAT is what Dawkins should have stuck at. As a neo-Darwinist he stood tall in my eyes. The Selfish Gene was and is a remarkable book. I really do not think he needs to carry on with his anti-religious message. He has said enough... but then maybe it pays more than science?

mp