well qualified creatiuonists

!!!

You can't be "well qualified" to present an argument that all the evidence is against. The childish arguments of twenty years ago (what's the use of half an eye? how could feathers have evolved if you can't fly until they are perfect?) were answered immediately, elegantly and easily. The attempt to sneak creationism in via "intelligent design" has failed, simply because they've never been able to produce a structure so "irreduceably complex" that there was no option but to admit that it had to be designed. Even their favourite, the bacterial flagellum, turns out to have evolved from a simpler structure which developed to solve quite a different problem.