hi paul.i read your link which you posted without comment.im not qualified to rebutt it except that even as a non scientist i would question quite a lot of it.there may well be those who can/have done so and hopefully without the slander [lies accusasion]contained therein.perhaps your lack of comment signifies your disassotiation?.reading between the lines and comparison of your posts i suspect you already knew of some bones of contension but put the bait out for this fish to bite.as far as i can see, my point about fossil record not neat and tidy and presuppositions still stands.ps puns attempted herein intentional-spelling mistakes not!.God bless you[even if you dont accept his existence!]