where do i start?talk about cat among the pigeons!despite regarding my position as nonsence you keep coming back.welcome one and all.josep-you use a decietful analogy especially as evolutionist adherents have developed those white supremist ideas.hi steve-certainly darwin was a learned man but not infallible and the same applies to creatoinist scientists.you have no hesitation in insulting them -i say again,i have used no such demeaning words about you or darwin.you are quite correct in assuming i,ve not read darwin et al though i have watched dawkins programmes and evolution permeates the media.the "rants"you refer to are articles by qualified scientists and i cant recall any of the ill will on them as is often exhibited here.i dont suppose if i read dawkins you would read sarfatis "greatest hoax on earth"?mrrzy-thats your position.as already intimated others may interpret the data differently.donuel-that was a cariculture that is sometimes true but not in respect to those on creation.com.im sure it works both ways too.hi ebbie-i agree that neither camp has all the answers but i suggest its wise to look for them-not just what appeals-BTW thanks for being a pleasant poster!