admittedly not a scientist mrrzy but is not the DNA already encoded in the feotus.it is baby/child/adult in the making.surely this is not your justification for killing unborn babies.as for a womans choice that is the law pretty much at the moment but people of other convictions are entitled to campaign provided it is done lawfully.this is what wiberforce did as regards slavery when whites often reguaded blacks as subhuman.steve-such an educated man but you dont know what im on about?!you seemed to understand enougth to "answer"me prevviouly.BTW is bullfrog a play on bulldog=huxley i believe who took darwins ideas further than darwin intended.bill-i guess you are being halfway charitable but i think you understood that i was referring to scientists who not only uphold creationism from a solid biblical foundation but give extensive scientific reasons to do so.not that i could develope it fully but to give an example-the strata explained by evolutionists as formed over aeons is alternately explained by catastrophism as in a global flood.best wishes to all.