bigchucks suggestion was performers - plural. no mention of excluding anyone. In fact, the word "single" doesn't appear anywhere in his post.

I asked what your idea of a woman's concert was. I said I had no problem with a woman's themed concert.

I do have a problem with anything that STARTS with the concept of excluding someone. What is WRONG with having a problem with that? The main room of HearMe is a public forum. Private rooms are available. Exclusionary activities should be confined to private rooms, that is why they are "private". To exclude the public.

You have just said you don't object to anyone listening, so it can't be that you think women are inhibited by men listening. So basically it boils down to you want to exclude men. period. THAT is what I object to. As I stated before, I would object to it if it were women being excluded, or banjo palyers or whatever.

And if all you want is a women's themed concert, then I have no objections. none. nada. Which is how I OPENED my comments.

Since you care to interpret my remarks as inflamatory, and sexually biased, we shall have to agree to disagree. My bias is against exclusion. I don't know what your bias is as you have consistantly refused to discuss this issue, other then to state (repeatedly) that it is a result of men looking for a fight.