jack-saying that creation science is clearly nonsence,is hardly constructive ,as is the link to a trailer ridiculing ID.frankly i was surprised at you resorting to this,when you usually have reasoned arguments.no,i have not read darwin et al,which creation scientist did you read before pronouncing it nonsence?.as to grammer,i already posted my slowness typing so i am not changing that im afraid.read if you wish or ignore if you wish.most of my previous post was to ,and in answer to johns enquiry anyway.
steve-asking about the need for the virgin birth and the resurrection-shall i explain the gospel again ?!
i dont see why asking if there is a creation why there should not be a creator.
again you put words in my mouth which i did not say.i am not claiming our christian heritage as only for christians.i am glad you find something agreeable in it .i just found it ironic,and was only making a good humoured jibe-no offence intended.