Is this a thread about means of getting a view heard by decision makers or ways to remove them?

Richard Bridge has just pointed out that in his view it is not a legitimate government. Thanks for that Richard, I can now stop trying to debate and just ignore you as you have just proved your views to be irrelevant.

if you think it is not a legitimate government, then all bets are off to remove them. Are you going to dig the holes next to the wall to put the posts in for the firing squads? thought not. Get back in your armchair where you do least harm.

A bit further up on this thread, somebody pointed out the difference between a breach of law and breaking the law. I questioned this and it was, as far as I can see, repeated. Part of what i do for a government body these days is upholding a piece of legislation in which those being regulated can be dealt with without legal means, (restrictions on practice) or dealt with in the civil courts or ultimately through the criminal system. interestingly, there are tipping points in which you drift from one level of regulation to the next but nowhere in that, or I believe any other, is there a difference between a breach of the law and breaking the law. You can be guilty of letting society down either way.

Oh, and this urban dictionary Richard is harping on about. I only heard of it via him the other day, and was bemused to read what a Steamin' Willie is... Of course, that's what it is in this toilet humour website that Richard seems to visit. Me? I'm not swept into puerile humour in the same way, so at least where I am concerned, Steamin' Willie means me, warts & all. Loss of various bodily fluids are for Richard's literature readings, not mine.