if steve is still peeking in,here is one scientist [among others]that disputes evolution :dr matti leisola-i first read of him in creation magazine,but seeing you call creationists frauds i also checked on internet.wiki lists a string of credentials to his credit.
his expertise in biotechnology ,i dont think makes him a"moron"in countering evolutionism.
asking humbly of you learned scientists-what is the evolutionary take on DNA which i understand is composed of so many parts it surpasses a hi tech factory and of which each has to be in place to function.how does evolution propose an upward path in such mechanisms that apparently may lose or transfer information but are not known to gain it?sorry if its a bit muddled but hope you get the drift
ron-must admit that it may be innacurate to say dawkins motive is money.having seen him on tv a few times,i think it more likely he is genuinely paronoic about God!