is not positing teapots on the moon a red herring or straw man or something evading the point.back to basics-nothing is known to create itself and for millions a creator requires less faith than the belief that it just happened.the claim that evolution is a fact is one worldview interpreting the data according to the a presupposition,but unfortunately they dont [largely ]allow other scientists to do the same without mockery or even persecution.
i hear that a top scientist in israel was sacked for being a skeptic on global warming and evolution.he apparently committed the unforgivable sin of suggesting teaching alternatives as well as evolutionism.and what is so dangerous about that?.whether taught in religious or science class as long as the science is tackled ,why the objection?.
atheists often decry religion in the school but insist on their faith position being taught exclusively.[if that position is as unassailable as evolutionists assert,what are they so worried about?]

yes,but thats science you cry, but my questions to you are not answered,except directing me to darwin and dawkins.well it might go over my head but a former teacher like steve ought to be able to help me understand the logic of your position,even if i dont accept it.o k you are not teaching now and you have no time for me,even though i have consistently responded to you-without insults and mockery.
someone earlier compared creation scientists to scientists believing in reincarnation.i dont believe in that and i shall have to take your word that they exist,but if they can present scientific reasoning, as creation scientists do on their subject,they should at least be respected,though not agreed with.