some of your suggestions seemed more reasonable than i expected,though couched in rigidly atheist terms.
it is probably not uniformly practical but presentations to older children from both ends of the debate would seem fair.
my citing creationist scientists is at least as reasonable as the assertions you continually make.you may recall that i invited evolutionists to give me their take on the complexity of cells.how do mechanisms that are not known to gain information provide an upward evolutionary path?.why is it not more reasonable that such complexity is created ?.dr matti leisola realized this even while a student and asked his professors how evolution could create biological novelties:"they of course had stories but when it came to mechanisms (which science is all about)of evolution they had no real explanations.later i started to present evidence for the limits of random change in scientific conferences of my own field and till now nobody has disagreed"