It's amazing how many critics of Dawkins haven't actually read the book they are so quick to criticise. So we get this:

Dawkins knows this well and chooses to abandon the role of a scientist. Cf. Wikipedia articles

And this:

Personally, I do not know where Dawkins comes from but he does strike me as being a head battering type. He might get cheers of applause from his fellow believers but from the little I have read about him, he stikes me as being every bit as bad as a holier than though Christian [sic]

At least, in Christian-type countries, we were force-fed the Bible. No-one forces anyone to read Dawkins. No wonder atheists often sound far more knowledgeable than Christians. God, I could be trolling...