I get bothered by stuff like the fact that the murdered woman's own children said the suspect they saw was a man. They were obviously witnesses (I'm not sufficiently clued up on the story to know how much of the slaying they actually saw, but obviously it was enough to identify a certain amount). This is evidence that clearly supports Bambi's claim to innocence. Why has it been sidetracked? What else has been conveniently ignored?

There have been gross misattributions of guilt before, which ruined lives (remember Jon Benét Ramsay's parents?) so what chance does a "marginal" member of society like Bambi have against a system that needs to find a bad guy and has decided that she's it?