thankyou for your very wordy responses to my straightforward challenge, but which seem to amount to a lack of evidence,other than appeal to other "authorities"and my own lack of reading darwin/dawkins directly.
even suppose i were to read darwins books it would not mean you would consider the creationist case any more,would it steve?
and as i have also said before;you issue challenges but dont accept them yourself.my sources ie scientists who are creationists[though formerly evolutionist often]have read all those books and quote them,yet you dismiss them as oxymoronic-though i do note you are more polite lately,thanks.

stingsinger-if you have no evidence for evolutionism,i guess that makes it a faith position

i understand that historically it was a literal understanding of the bible among scientists that led to a great advance in practical science,as i think even atheists have sometimes conceded.by contrast,evolutionism has little impact on experimental science,that would not as well be the case by design.if you know otherwise;im sure you will say.

as to strident rants;ireckon you are more proficient at this skill than myself!

i am not in the least surprised by a rising interest in atheism.it is entirely in line with biblical predictions!i could give you chapter and verse if you like!
thankyou gentlemen for your continued interest which opportunes the sharing of my faith with you.