yes foolestroupe there was some sarcasm in light of your previous post, but not entirely.i was also making a bit of humour[did,nt work!]and honest admittance of your greater learning,though not agreeing with your conclusions.
i,ve no idea who this corporal is,
seems the rest of your post alleged falsehood on the part of creationists.do you imply they dont have phds,or is it simply because they come to opposite conclusions.
its one thing to allege consistencies,and worse, claim wilful errors-but its another thing to demonstrate as such.
perhaps you should learn some moderation from darwin;as i quoted earlier.
some of the creation.com site does touch on emotional issues eg abortion,racism,demicide,but some of it is hardgoing[for me]technical stuff.
not sure that i,ve read "proof" much,though "evidence"probably is used as a reguler word on the site.