It is for the premises operator in the first instance to determine whether or not activities at their premises require licensing, and in the light of that decision, for the local licensing authority to decide if any action should be taken by them.

Should the local licensing authority decide that in this case the Tate Gallery did and does require that these premises need to obtain additional entertainment licensing and that the Turner Prize-winning exhibit was a performance of Regulated Entertainment - perhaps someone, either in Central or Local Govt, will take responsibilty and address a situation which has placed the public at risk?